Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Postoperative Outcomes Between Peroral Esophageal Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy With Fundoplication: A Systematic Review

Abishek Latha Kumar; Aishwarya Sadagopan; Anas Mahmoud; Maha Begg; Mawada Tarhuni; Monique N Fotso; Natalie A Gonzalez; Raghavendra R Sanivarapu; Usama Osman; Tuheen Sankar Nath

doi:10.7759/cureus.44877

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Postoperative Outcomes Between Peroral Esophageal Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy With Fundoplication: A Systematic Review

Cureus. 2023 Sep 7;15(9):e44877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44877. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
² Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
³ Obstetrics and Gynecology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
⁴ Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
⁵ Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Midland and Odessa, USA.
⁶ Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, USA.
⁷ Geriatrics, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
⁸ Surgical Oncology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Abstract

Achalasia, a neurodegenerative disease caused by the progressive destruction of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus, is accompanied by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) coupled with fundoplication has been the gold standard procedure for achalasia. Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) has recently gained popularity as it is minimally invasive, has fewer adverse events, and has excellent short-term outcomes. So, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, and postoperative outcomes between LHM and POEM. We did a systematic review by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for 2020 and exploring research databases such as PUBMED and PMC Central, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. After appropriate screenings, articles relevant to the review were scrutinized based on the eligibility criteria. Quality assessment tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) were used to finalize the articles. A total of 11 articles (seven observational studies, two RCTs, and two systematic reviews) were included in the review after a quality check. The study included 2127 patients, classified into 981 for POEM and 1146 for LHM, who had undergone treatment for achalasia. Most of the studies had a follow-up of ≤ two years. Comparing efficacy, POEM had similar results to LHM in terms of Eckardt scores. However, abnormal DeMeester scores were found in POEM. Adverse events were significantly higher in LHM when compared to POEM in terms of safety. Peroral esophageal myotomy also stood out as having a shorter procedure time, a shorter hospital stay, and lesser odds of being a clinical failure. As for postoperative outcomes, despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors, LHM was more effective in preventing the development of esophagitis compared to POEM due to partial fundoplication. Postoperative reflux and the development of esophagitis remain certain with POEM and need to be followed up with more studies with longer follow-ups. However, POEM still stands as a better choice compared to LHM in terms of efficacy and safety.

Keywords: #esophageal achalasia; #esophagitis; #gastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd); #heller myotomy; #peroral endoscopic myotomy (poem).

Publication types

Review