Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: A review of systematic reviews

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 7;18(9):e0290977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290977. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Aim: To identify indicators sensitive to the practice of primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs).

Materials and methods: A review of systematic reviews was undertaken to identify indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice. Published and grey literature was searched from January 1, 2010 to December 2, 2022. Titles/abstracts (n = 4251) and full texts (n = 365) were screened independently by two reviewers, with a third acting as a tie-breaker. Reference lists of relevant publications were reviewed. Risk of bias was examined independently by two reviewers using AMSTAR-2. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer to describe study characteristics, indicators, and results. Indicators were recoded into categories. Findings were summarized using narrative synthesis.

Results: Forty-four systematic reviews were retained including 271 indicators that were recoded into 26 indicator categories at the patient, provider and health system levels. Nineteen reviews were assessed to be at low risk of bias. Patient indicator categories included activities of daily living, adaptation to health conditions, clinical conditions, diagnosis, education-patient, mortality, patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, and signs and symptoms. Provider indicator categories included adherence to best practice-providers, education-providers, illness prevention, interprofessional team functioning, and prescribing. Health system indicator categories included access to care, consultations, costs, emergency room visits, healthcare service delivery, hospitalizations, length of stay, patient safety, quality of care, scope of practice, and wait times.

Discussion: Equal to improved care for almost all indicators was found consistently for the PHCNP group. Very few indicators favoured the control group. No indicator was identified for high/low fidelity simulation, cultural safety and cultural sensitivity with people in vulnerable situations or Indigenous Peoples.

Conclusion: This review of systematic reviews identified patient, provider and health system indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice. The findings help clarify how PHCNPs contribute to care outcomes.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020198182.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Humans
  • Nurse Practitioners*
  • Primary Health Care
  • Quality of Life
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Le Réseau intersectoriel de recherche en santé de l’Université du Québec (RISUQ: https://risuq.uquebec.ca/) (Project Grant Number 304168 (30416801); Principal investigator: ENT). KK and ENT are also supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/en/health/), who respectively hold Research Scholar Senior (Award Number 298573 [KK]) and Junior 2 (Award Number 299044 [ENT]) salary awards. All the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.