Is Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy of Clinical Importance in the Initial Staging of Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma?

Abstract

Background: Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma are rare tumors within the Ewing sarcoma family. Initial staging studies for extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma historically have included imaging and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB). However, recent studies on Ewing sarcoma of bone have questioned the utility of BMAB in the initial staging of patients, but no studies of which we are aware have evaluated the role of BMAB in extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. We suspected that BMAB was of low diagnostic yield in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma and exposed patients to potential morbidity without an impact on their clinical course.

Question/purpose: Is BMAB a useful test in the staging of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma?

Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2021, our institution evaluated 109 patients with a listed diagnosis of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. Those patients were retrospectively reviewed for this study. Of those, we considered patients with biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. Biopsy was performed based on institutional protocols, with all diagnoses assigned by a board-certified pathologist. Based on that criteria, 96% (105 of 109) were eligible. An additional 18% (20 of 109) were excluded because records of their initial diagnostic and staging workup were not available. This left 78% (85 of 109) for analysis. Of those, 52% (44 of 85) were male. The average age was 32 ± 16 years. Primary tumor locations included extremities in 26% (22 of 85), paraspinal in 20% (17 of 85), chest in 19% (16 of 85), retroperitoneum in 13% (11 of 85), intraabdominal in 12% (10 of 85), intrapelvic in 7% (6 of 85), and head or neck in 4% (3 of 85). Initial diagnostic and staging information, including the use of PET-CT, bone scan, CT chest, and BMAB, was collected. Metastatic disease at the time of presentation or during follow-up was noted. The utility of BMAB was determined by the rate of positive tests in those undergoing BMAB during the initial staging process. Descriptive statistical analysis was sufficient to address the study question, and therefore no comparative statistics were performed.

Results: BMAB was obtained during the initial staging process in 64% (54 of 85) of patients. This BMAB was negative in all 54 patients, including those with known metastatic disease.

Conclusion: Diagnosing metastatic disease in extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma is important as the presence of metastases at diagnosis adversely affects prognosis. The routine use of BMAB in the staging process of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma is of low diagnostic yield. BMAB is unlikely to diagnose metastatic involvement even in patients with known metastases to bone. We do not have enough data to suggest whether other modalities, such as PET-CT, might be more useful. Similar studies should be pursued to determine the utility of the remainder of staging modalities in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma to elucidate the most efficient and effective staging protocol.

Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.