Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous ChAdOx1-nCoV19 and BNT162b2 vaccination: A meta-analysis of the heterologous COVID-19 vaccination outcomes

Vaccine. 2023 May 2;41(18):3003-3010. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.056. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Abstract

Introduction: Here, we systematically assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination regimens.

Materials and methods: We evaluated the immunogenicity by the geometric mean titers ratio (GMTR) of the neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG. The safety of heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination was evaluated using the pooled risk ratios (RRs) calculated by the random-effects model about the adverse events. Our study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021265165.

Results: Eleven studies were included in the analyses. Compared to the homologous ChAd/ChAd vaccination, the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed significantly higher immunogenicity in terms of the neutralizing antibody and GMTR of anti-spike IgG, but at the same time displayed higher incidence of total adverse reactions, especially for the local adverse reactions. Moreover, heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed similar immunogenicity to the homologous BNT/BNT vaccination (GMTR of neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG) and similar safety.

Discussion: Heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed robust immunogenicity and tolerable safety.

Keywords: COVID-19; Heterologous vaccination; Immunogenicity; Meta-analysis; SARS-CoV-2.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • BNT162 Vaccine*
  • COVID-19 Vaccines / adverse effects
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Vaccination / adverse effects

Substances

  • BNT162 Vaccine
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Antibodies, Viral