Clinical outcomes of dose modification during pirfenidone treatment for IPF: A nationwide post-marketing surveillance study

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 10:13:1025947. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1025947. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: Pirfenidone, an antifibrotic medication approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), often requires dose reduction owing to adverse events. In this study, we evaluated if pirfenidone's reduced dose has any impact on clinical outcomes in patients with IPF. Methods: We used the data of a prospective post-marketing study of pirfenidone conducted at 10 hospitals in South Korea from 2014 to 2017. Dose reduction was defined when the pirfenidone dose was temporarily or permanently reduced to manage adverse events or when the treatment dose failed to reach the standard dose. Study patients were classified based on the most frequently administered dose during 48-week follow-up-1800 mg, 1,200 mg, and <1,200 mg/days. The following clinical outcomes were compared between the groups: death, hospitalization, acute exacerbation, pulmonary function decline, and changes in severity of dyspnea and cough. Results: The median follow-up duration in all 143 patients was 11 months. During the study period, 70.6% experienced at least one dose reduction. Patients treated with standard-dose pirfenidone tended to be young and had the lowest diffusing capacity. Pulmonary function changes did not differ depending on the pirfenidone dose. The three groups were not significantly different in terms of the proportion of death, hospitalization, and acute exacerbation. The symptom changes were also similar between the groups. Conclusion: Reduced doses did not negatively impact clinical outcomes compared with the standard-dose pirfenidone in patients with IPF. Dose reduction may be a useful method to manage adverse events while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords: dose reduction; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; mortality; pirfenidone; pulmonary function.

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants from the Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2022R1A2B5B02001602) and the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program (NRF-2022M3A9E4082647) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea, and also supported by the National Institute of Health research project (2021ER120701) and by Korea Environment Industry and Technology Institute through Core Technology Development Project for Environmental Diseases Prevention and Management Program funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (ARQ202201450001), Republic of Korea. The PMS study received funding from Ildong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. In this posthoc analysis, the funder was not involved in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication