Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
2022 Nov 8;119(45):e2216034119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216034119.
Epub 2022 Nov 2.
Authors
Luke Kemp
1
2
,
Chi Xu
3
,
Joanna Depledge
4
,
Kristie L Ebi
5
,
Goodwin Gibbins
6
,
Timothy A Kohler
7
8
9
,
Johan Rockström
10
,
Marten Scheffer
11
,
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
10
12
,
Will Steffen
13
,
Timothy M Lenton
14
Affiliations
1
Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1SB, United Kingdom.
2
Darwin College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EU, United Kingdom.
3
School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
4
Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom.
5
Center for Health and the Global Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
6
Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0DJ, United Kingdom.
7
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4910.
8
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.
9
Cluster of Excellence ROOTS, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
10
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.
11
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Wageningen, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
12
Earth System Science Department, Tsinghua University, 100190 Beijing, China.
13
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
14
Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom.
PMID:
36322745
PMCID:
PMC9659409
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2216034119
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Climate*
Research*