Potential for Front of Pack Labeling Exposure to Impact US Dietary Choices: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2017-2018

Nutrients. 2022 Jul 21;14(14):2995. doi: 10.3390/nu14142995.

Abstract

In recent years, front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPL) schemes have proliferated, but the components of the diet subject to FOPL have not been described. This study quantified the proportion and elements of the diet that would be subject to FOPL in the US. The 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 7121; age ≥2 year) 24-h dietary recalls were used to identify foods/beverages subject to FOPL. The proportion of dietary energy and additional dietary constituents subject to FOPL was estimated. Overall, 57% of dietary energy would be subject to FOPL. Individuals consuming more away-from-home meals had lower exposure to FOPL. Adults with a healthy-weight and those consuming a more healthful diet had more exposure to FOPL. Protein, sodium, potassium, whole fruit, vegetables, and unprocessed meats were less subject to FOPL as compared to total sugars, added sugars, calcium, fruit juice, milk, yogurt, nuts/seeds and whole grains. Because less than 60% of the diet would be impacted by FOPL, implementation of such a policy may have limited reach for the US diet and demonstrates some inconsistencies with current dietary guidance regarding the under- and over-representation of key food groups and nutrients.

Keywords: NHANES; United States; cross-sectional studies; diet behaviors; diet surveys; food labeling; food packaging; front-of-pack labeling; health status.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diet*
  • Humans
  • Nutrition Surveys
  • Sugars
  • Vegetables*

Substances

  • Sugars

Grants and funding

All authors are paid employees of PepsiCo. This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by PepsiCo.