Reproducibility of rapid multi-parameter mapping at 3T and 7T with highly segmented and accelerated 3D-EPI

Magn Reson Med. 2022 Nov;88(5):2217-2232. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29383. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

Abstract

Purpose: Quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM) has been shown to provide good longitudinal and cross-sectional reproducibility for clinical research. Unfortunately, acquisition times (TAs) are typically infeasible for routine scanning at high resolutions.

Methods: A fast whole-brain MPM protocol based on interleaved multi-shot 3D-EPI with controlled aliasing (SC-EPI) at 3T and 7T is proposed and compared with MPM using a standard spoiled gradient echo (FLASH) sequence. Four parameters (R1 , PD, R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ , and MTsat) were measured in less than 3 min at 1 mm isotropic resolution. Five subjects went through the same scanning sessions twice at each scanner. The intra-subject coefficient of variation (scan-rescan) (CoV) was estimated for each protocol and scanner to assess the longitudinal reproducibility.

Results: At 3T, the CoV of SC-EPI ranged between 1.2%-4.8% for PD and R1 , 2.8%-10.6% for R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ and MTsat, which was comparable with FLASH (0.6%-4.9% for PD and R1 , 2.6%-11.3% for R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ and MTsat). At 7T, where the SC-EPI TA was reduced to ∼2 min, the CoV of SC-EPI (1.4%-10.6% for PD, R1 , and R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ ) was 1.2-2.4 times larger than the CoV of FLASH (1.0%-15%) and MTsat showed much higher variability across subjects. The SC-EPI-MPM protocol at 3T showed high reproducibility and yielded stable quantitative maps at a clinically feasible resolution and scan time, whereas at 7T, MT saturation homogeneity needs to be improved.

Conclusion: SC-EPI-based MPM is feasible as an additional MRI modality in clinical or population studies where the parameters offer great potential as biomarkers.

Keywords: EPI; MPM; MT; PD; T1; T2*.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain Mapping* / methods
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Reproducibility of Results