Obstetrical Outcomes After Implementation of Laborist Model During the COVID-19 Pandemic

J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):e1243-e1246. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001066. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted labor and delivery units to establish ways to decrease viral exposure to healthcare workers while continuing to deliver optimal patient care. A laborist model was implemented to improve safety at our tertiary care hospital in Long Island. The aim of the study is to determine whether implementation of a laborist model during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a change in the frequency of cesarean birth.

Methods: The retrospective cohort study included patients who delivered at a single tertiary center during March 2019 to May 2019 and March 2020 to May 2020 when our laborist model was initiated. The primary outcome compared the frequency of a cesarean delivery between both models. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of adverse obstetrical complications, which included intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, intra-amniotic infection, hemorrhage, and need for blood transfusion. Statistical analysis included multivariable regression to adjust for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 1506 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in the frequency of cesarean births between both models (37% versus 35%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-2.89). Similarly, there were no significant differences in adverse outcomes between the study populations (adjusted odds ratio, 1.064; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.59).

Conclusions: A change in practice behavior during a pandemic was not associated with an increase in frequency of cesarean births or adverse obstetrical outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • Cesarean Section
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Obstetrics*
  • Pandemics
  • Pregnancy
  • Retrospective Studies