Less Time Is Less Motion: Analysis of Practical Efficiencies Gained With a Modified Workflow Integrating Planar kV Midimaging With CBCT for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

David Y Hu; Yiwen Xu; Yu-Hui Chen; Marjan Khosravi; Yulia Lyatskaya; Jeremy S Bredfeldt; Fred L Hacker; Tracy A Balboni; Alexander Spektor; Daniel Cagney; Raymond Mak; Mai Anh Huynh

doi:10.1016/j.adro.2022.100961

Less Time Is Less Motion: Analysis of Practical Efficiencies Gained With a Modified Workflow Integrating Planar kV Midimaging With CBCT for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 8;7(5):100961. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100961. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
² Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to optimize an image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) workflow to achieve practical setup accuracy in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We assessed the time-saving efficiencies gained from incorporating planar kV midimaging as a surrogate for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for intrafraction motion monitoring.

Methods and materials: We selected 5 thoracic spine SBRT patients treated in 5 fractions and analyzed patient shifts captured by a modified IGRT workflow using planar kV midimaging integrated with CBCT to maintain a tolerance of 1 mm and 1°. We determined the frequency at which kV midimaging captured intrafraction motion as validated on repeat CBCT and assessed the potential time and dosimetric advantages of our modified IGRT workflow.

Results: Patient motion, detected as out-of-tolerance shifts on planar kV midimaging, occurred during 6 of 25 fractions (24%) and were validated on repeat CBCT 100% of the time. Observed intrafraction absolute shifts (mean ± standard deviation) for the 25 fractions were 0.39 ± 0.21, 0.56 ± 0.22, and 0.45 ± 0.21 mm for lateral-longitude-vertical translations and 0.38 ± 0.12°, 0.32 ± 0.09°, and 0.47 ± 0.14° for pitch-roll-yaw rotation, which if uncorrected, could have significantly affected target coverage and increased spinal cord dose. The average times for pretreatment imaging, midtreatment verification, and total treatment time were 8.94, 2.81, and 16.21 minutes. Our modified IGRT workflow reduced the total number of CBCTs required from 120 to 35 (70%) and imaging dose from 126.2 to 43.4 cGy (65.6%) while maintaining high fidelity for our patient population.

Conclusions: Accurate patient positioning was effectively achieved with use of multiple 2-dimensional-3-dimensional kV images and an average of 1 verification CBCT scan per fraction. Integration of planar kV midimaging can effectively reduce treatment time associated with spine SBRT delivery and minimize the potential dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion on target coverage and spinal cord dose.