Humeral shaft fractures: a cost-effectiveness analysis of operative versus nonoperative management

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Sep;31(9):1969-1981. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.033. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

Abstract

Background: Humeral shaft fractures can be managed operatively or nonoperatively with functional bracing in the absence of neurovascular injury, open fracture, or polytrauma. A consensus on optimal management has not been reached, nor has the cost-effectiveness perspective been investigated.

Methods: A decision tree was constructed describing the management of humeral shaft fractures with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), and functional bracing in a non-elderly population. Probabilities were defined using weighted averages determined from systematic review of the literature. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, measured in cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY were evaluated.

Results: Eighty-six studies were included. Using bracing as the referent in the health care model, we observed that bracing was the preferred strategy at both incremental cost-effectiveness ratio thresholds. ORIF and IMN had higher overall effectiveness (0.917 QALYs and 0.913 QALYs, respectively) compared with bracing (0.877 QALYs). The cost-effectiveness of bracing was driven by a substantially lower overall cost. In the societal model-accounting for both health care and societal costs-the cost difference narrowed between bracing, ORIF, and IMN. Bracing remained the preferred strategy at the $50,000/QALY threshold; ORIF was preferred at the $100,000/QALY threshold. ORIF and IMN were comparable strategies across a range of probability values in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Functional bracing, with its low cost and satisfactory clinical outcomes, is often the most cost-effective strategy for humeral shaft fracture management. ORIF becomes preferable at the higher willingness-to-pay threshold when societal burden is considered. QALY values for ORIF and IMN were comparable.

Keywords: Humerus; cost-benefit analysis; decision making; functional bracing; intramedullary nail; midshaft humerus; open reduction–internal fixation; quality-adjusted life-years.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal*
  • Humans
  • Humeral Fractures* / surgery
  • Humerus
  • Open Fracture Reduction
  • Treatment Outcome