Context: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has led many leaders to reassess how recruitment into the medical field is conducted. In Hospice and Palliative Medicine, many training programs are moving to virtual recruitment as a more permanent strategy. However, virtual recruitment disproportionately affects smaller training programs as well as those in smaller cities or those whose location is less well-known.
Objectives: To assess faculty perspective regarding the value of virtual vs. face-to-face recruitment methods in a well-established program located in a mid-sized city that is lesser known than many comparable programs.
Methods: After virtual recruitment season in 2020, we assessed our faculty regarding the process of virtual interviews. Survey items were based on results of the 2020 NRMP Internal Medicine Program Director Survey to include the most highly cited factors used to rank internal medicine applicants. Faculty was asked whether virtual or face-to-face interviews were more effective and were asked to make an overall choice between face to face and virtual recruitment formats and to explain the reason behind their decision.
Results: Twenty-three faculty received the survey and 17 completed. Although more faculty felt that in-person interviews allowed for better ability to recruit the most qualified trainees than virtual interviews, nine out of the 17 faculty chose virtual as their preferred format.
Conclusion: While acknowledging benefits that can only be achieved in-person, our faculty believe that virtual interviews for future Hospice and Palliative Medicine fellows is an effective and potentially advantageous way to recruit the future work force of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.
Keywords: Fellowship; recruitment; virtual.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.