Assessing cervical spine and craniofacial morphology in Class II and Class III malocclusions: A geometric morphometric approach

Cranio. 2024 Jul;42(4):450-460. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.1987040. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Abstract

To compare craniofacial and cervical morphology between skeletal Classes II and III applying Geometric Morphometric Methods (GMM). Twenty-six cervical and craniofacial landmarks of 40 Class II and 39 Class III individuals were digitalized on lateral cephalograms. Procrustes ANOVA, generalized Procrustes, principal component analyses, and thin-plate spline function were applied to assess the pattern of shape variation of craniofacial structure and the cervical spine in relation to skeletal classes. Compared with Class III, Class II individuals presented a maxillary protrusion, mandibular retrusion, shorter mandibular corpus, posterior mandibular ramus rotation, anterior cranial base rotation, and a smaller centroid size. Furthermore, a forward and smaller cervical spine were observed. With GMM, the shape and size differences between skeletal classes can be analyzed visually and numerically.

Keywords: Malocclusion; cervical vertebrae; craniofacial morphology; geometric morphometrics; skeletal class.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anatomic Landmarks
  • Cephalometry* / methods
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / anatomy & histology
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / diagnostic imaging
  • Cervical Vertebrae* / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II* / diagnostic imaging
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II* / pathology
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III* / diagnostic imaging
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III* / pathology
  • Mandible / anatomy & histology
  • Mandible / diagnostic imaging
  • Mandible / pathology
  • Maxilla / anatomy & histology
  • Maxilla / diagnostic imaging
  • Maxilla / pathology
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Skull Base / anatomy & histology
  • Skull Base / diagnostic imaging
  • Skull Base / pathology
  • Young Adult