[Influence of female age on the fresh cycle live birth rate of different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in poor ovarian response patients]

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 25;56(7):482-488. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210219-00084.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of age on the fresh cycle live birth rate in patients with poor ovarian response in different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation groups. Methods: The clinical data of 3 342 patients in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2014 to November 2018 were retrospectively collected, including early-follicular phase long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol group (1 375 cases), mid-luteal phase short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol group (1 161 cases) and GnRH antagonist protocol group (806 cases); each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to age: ≤30 years, 31-35 years, 36-40 years and >40 years, the pregnancy outcomes in each age subgroup were analyzed under different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols. Results: In early-follicular phase long-acting GnRH agonist long protocol group, the final live birth rates of each age subgroup were 39.4% (228/579), 36.1% (135/374), 16.6% (48/290) and 3.0% (4/132); in mid-luteal phase short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol group, live birth rates of each age subgroup were 32.1% (99/308), 20.8% (55/264), 13.0% (45/346) and 7.0% (17/243); in GnRH antagonist protocol group, live birth rates of each age subgroup were 22.8% (26/114), 16.3% (25/153), 11.2% (31/278), and 3.8% (10/261); the live birth rate of each group decreased significantly with the increase of age (all P<0.01). When the age≤35 years old, the fresh cycle live birth rate of the early-follicular phase long-acting GnRH agonist long protocol group was significantly better than those of the other two groups (all P<0.01). The multivariate logistic regression analysis of age and live birth rate of the three controlled ovarian hyperstimulation groups showed age was the independent influence factor (OR=0.898, 95%CI: 0.873-0.916, P<0.01; OR=0.926, 95%CI: 0.890-0.996, P<0.01; OR=0.901, 95%CI: 0.863-0.960, P<0.01). Conclusions: Age is an independent influencing factor for the prediction of fresh cycle live birth rate in low ovarian response patients. No matter which controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol is adopted, the final live birth rate decreases significantly with the increase of women's age. In addition, the early-follicular phase long-acting GnRH agonist long protocol has the highest fresh cycle live birth rate among all controlled ovarian hyperstimulation groups.

目的: 探讨不同卵巢刺激方案下年龄因素对卵巢低反应人群新鲜周期活产率的影响。 方法: 回顾性分析郑州大学第一附属医院于2014年2月至2018年11月接受辅助生殖治疗的3 342例卵巢低反应患者的临床资料,根据不同卵巢刺激方案分为卵泡期长效长方案组(1 375例)、黄体期短效长方案组(1 161例)、拮抗剂方案组(806例),每组再根据年龄分为4个年龄段:≤30岁、31~35岁、36~40岁、>40岁,并比较分析各年龄段患者的新鲜周期活产率。 结果: 卵泡期长效长方案组中,年龄≤30岁、31~35岁、36~40岁、>40岁患者的新鲜周期活产率分别为39.4%(228/579)、36.1%(135/374)、16.6%(48/290)、3.0%(4/132);黄体期短效长方案组中,各年龄段患者的新鲜周期活产率分别为32.1%(99/308)、20.8%(55/264)、13.0%(45/346)、7.0%(17/243);拮抗剂方案组中,各年龄段患者的新鲜周期活产率分别为22.8%(26/114)、16.3%(25/153)、11.2%(31/278)、3.8%(10/261);各组新鲜周期活产率均随年龄增大而明显降低(P均<0.01)。当年龄≤35岁时,卵泡期长效长方案组的新鲜周期活产率明显优于其他两组(P均<0.01);>35岁时,3种方案新鲜周期活产率无明显差异(P均>0.05)。3种方案下年龄与活产率的多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄是活产率的独立影响因素(卵泡期长效长方案组:OR=0.898,95%CI为0.873~0.916,P<0.01;黄体期短效长方案组:OR=0.926,95%CI为0.890~0.996,P<0.01;拮抗剂方案组:OR=0.901,95%CI为0.863~0.960,P<0.01)。 结论: 年龄是卵巢低反应患者活产率的独立影响因素,无论采取何种卵巢刺激方案,卵巢低反应患者的新鲜周期活产率均随女性年龄的增长而降低。卵泡期长效长方案在年龄≤35岁患者中有更高的新鲜周期活产率,这值得进一步探讨。.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Birth Rate*
  • Female
  • Fertilization in Vitro
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
  • Humans
  • Live Birth / epidemiology
  • Ovulation Induction*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone