Introduction Vascular calcification is a recognized indicator of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Calcium scoring is a widely used tool to measure coronary artery calcification, however has limitations for use elsewhere in the body. There is currently no gold standard for quantifying abdominal aortic calcification (AAC). We propose a simple and reproducible method to assess the severity of AAC using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) in CT angiograms (CTA). Methods A retrospective analysis of CTAs from 75 patients over two years was performed. Using a novel six-point scoring system, three radiologists independently scored the severity of AAC in the distal abdominal aorta. Interclass correlation (ICC) was used to assess the degree of agreement between the three raters. Calcium scoring of the same region was also calculated for each patient. We used Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to compare the CT calcium score with the corresponding average rater's atheroma score. Results There was significant agreement between raters' scores, with an ICC value = 0.972, 95% (CI 0.959-0.981, p < 0.0001). There was also a strong correlation between an average rater's atheroma score with the corresponding CT calcium score, rho = 0.85 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion The results show excellent reproducibility of scores between radiologists, as well as a strong correlation between this novel scoring tool and calcium scores, indicating that it is a reliable method for the grading of AAC. We propose that this simple semi-quantitative method could form a widely used system for AAC disease stratification.
Keywords: abdominal aorta; atherosclerosis; calcium scoring; computed tomographic angiography; computed tomography (ct ); vascular calcification.
Copyright © 2021, Reddy et al.