Immune-checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in advanced head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy. 2021 Apr;13(6):541-555. doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0070. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

Aim: We assessed the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors relative to other systemic therapies in previously treated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Relative treatment effects were assessed from eligible randomized controlled trials using Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: Among 15 trials evaluating 14 treatments, nivolumab achieved the best overall survival (OS) benefit; zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel provided the best progression-free survival benefit and objective response rate. Buparlisib + paclitaxel and zalutumumab were associated with the best OS rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively; nivolumab yielded the best OS rate at 18-24 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab was the most favorable treatment. Zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel had better efficiency, and might be a better selection for patients with programmed death-ligand 1-low/negative tumors than other treatments.

Keywords: HPV status; PD-L1 expression; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; immune-checkpoint inhibitor; network meta-analysis; recurrent or metastatic; standard of care; targeted therapy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / drug therapy
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors