Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Past, Present and Future

Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov;120(11):1484-1491. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714654. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Abstract

There are several situations whereby oral anticoagulation may be unsuitable for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has received much attention in this area. Various devices have already been developed and tested for this purpose. Data from registries and cohort studies have indicated favourable short- and long-term outcomes with LAA occlusion, and several international guidelines recommend its use in AF patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation. However, prospective controlled trials in this very population are lacking. Furthermore, while modelling studies on cost analyses have suggested that LAA occlusion may be a cost-effective strategy compared with standard medical therapy, these have not been performed in high-risk patients who may have limited survival in the medium to long term. Thus, while LAA occlusion offers promise, there is a strong need for additional research to investigate its exact role, its long-term outcomes and cost efficacy.

MeSH terms

  • Atrial Appendage / physiopathology
  • Atrial Appendage / surgery*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / surgery*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease Management
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Registries
  • Septal Occluder Device / economics
  • Septal Occluder Device / trends*
  • Stroke / prevention & control
  • Treatment Outcome