Does dog acquisition improve physical activity, sedentary behaviour and biological markers of cardiometabolic health? Results from a three-arm controlled study

Lauren Powell; Kate M Edwards; Adrian Bauman; Paul McGreevy; Anthony Podberscek; Brendon Neilly; Catherine Sherrington; Emmanuel Stamatakis

doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000703

Does dog acquisition improve physical activity, sedentary behaviour and biological markers of cardiometabolic health? Results from a three-arm controlled study

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Apr 8;6(1):e000703. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000703. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Lauren Powell¹, Kate M Edwards², Adrian Bauman¹, Paul McGreevy³, Anthony Podberscek⁴, Brendon Neilly⁵, Catherine Sherrington⁶, Emmanuel Stamatakis¹

Affiliations

¹ Charles Perkins Centre, Prevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
² Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
³ Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
⁶ Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Objectives: Dog ownership has been associated with improved cardiometabolic risk factors, including physical activity. Most of the evidence originates from cross-sectional studies or populations with established disease. This study investigated changes in physical activity and other cardiometabolic risk factors following dog acquisition in a sample of 71 community-dwelling adults.

Methods: Participants self-allocated to three groups: 17 individuals acquired a dog within 1 month of baseline (dog acquisition), 29 delayed dog acquisition until study completion (lagged control) and 25 had no interest in dog acquisition (community control). Self-reported and thigh-worn accelerometer-based physical activity patterns, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, resting heart rate and VO₂max were measured three times: baseline, 3 months and 8 months. Data were analysed using repeated measures analysis of covariance with owner age, season, sex and education included as covariates. Post hoc between-group tests were performed where there were significant overall effects (p<0.05).

Results: We found significant effects in mean daily steps (F(4,64)=3.02, p=0.02) and sit-to-stand transitions (F(4,66)=3.49, p=0.01). The dog acquisition group performed an additional 2589 steps (p=0.004) and 8.2 sit-to-stand transitions (p=0.03) per day at 3 months, although these effects were not maintained at 8 months. We found a significant effect in self-reported weekly walking duration (F(4,130)=2.84, p=0.03) among the lagged control group with an 80 min increase between 3 and 8 months (p=0.04). Other cardiometabolic risk factors were unchanged following dog acquisition.

Conclusion: Our study provides encouraging results that suggest a positive influence of dog acquisition on physical activity in the short term but larger and more generalisable controlled studies are needed.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12617000967381.

Keywords: accelerometer; aerobic fitness; cardiovascular; physical activity; sedentary.