Non-fusion mutations in endometrial stromal sarcomas: what is the potential impact on tumourigenesis through cell cycle dysregulation?

J Clin Pathol. 2020 Dec;73(12):830-835. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206432. Epub 2020 May 8.

Abstract

Targeted next-generation sequencing using the 50-gene Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 identified two significant point mutations in endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS). Case 1 is a uterine mass from a quadragenarian woman with a karyotype lacking any known ESS rearrangements but demonstrated to have a CTNNB1-activating mutation (c.133T>C, p.[Ser45Pro]). Analysis of a uterine mass from case 2, a sexagenarian woman, revealed biallelic CDKN2A-inactivating mutations (c.172C>T, p.[Arg58Ter] and a deletion). Break-apart studies to identify YWHAE, JAZF1 and PHF1 rearrangements were negative in both tumours. We propose a model in which these point mutations may affect cell proliferation, converging at Wnt signalling and G1-S checkpoint control, that independently or in concert with a rare gene fusion result in ESS tumour development or progression.

Keywords: cancer genetics; cell cycle regulation; gynaecological pathology; molecular genetics; sarcomas.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinogenesis / genetics*
  • Cell Cycle / genetics*
  • Cell Transformation, Neoplastic / genetics
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 / genetics
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Point Mutation
  • Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal / genetics*
  • Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal / pathology
  • beta Catenin / genetics

Substances

  • CDKN2A protein, human
  • CTNNB1 protein, human
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
  • beta Catenin