Screening for BKV-DNAEMIA after renal transplantation in a resource limited setting

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;96(4):114979. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114979. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

Abstract

Costs may hinder the implementation of BK polyomavirus (BKV)-DNAemia screening in resource-limited kidney transplant (KT) centers. We analyzed data from two studies to assess the performance and potential cost saving of a dual-step screening strategy based on the use of a preliminary qualitative semi-nested PCR (snPCR) assay followed by BKV-DNAemia quantification after KT. In the preliminary study, in which 130 samples from 33 KT recipients were screened for BKV-DNAemia, the estimated positive and negative predictive values of snPCR, as compared to quantitative PCR (qPCR), were 88% and 99%, respectively. In the second study, which included 84 KT recipients, BKV-DNAemia was detected by snPCR in 28/472 (5.9%) samples and confirmed by qPCR in 26 samples of 21 (25%) subjects. No graft loss occurred among KT recipients who developed BKV-DNAemia. Cost analyses suggested that this strategy might be a cost saving alternative for BKV-DNAemia screening for some resource-limited settings.

Keywords: BK polyomavirus; Cost; Real time PCR; Renal transplantation; Semi-nested PCR.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • BK Virus / isolation & purification*
  • Brazil
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • DNA, Viral / blood*
  • Female
  • Health Resources / economics
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Polyomavirus Infections / blood
  • Polyomavirus Infections / diagnosis*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tumor Virus Infections / blood
  • Tumor Virus Infections / diagnosis*
  • Viral Load

Substances

  • DNA, Viral