A matched case-control study comparing features, treatment and outcomes between patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jun;61(6):1388-1394. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1719100. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Abstract

Cases of non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) are rare. We performed a case-control study comparing features and outcomes of 31 non-IgM LPL cases and 93 Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) controls matched by age, sex, and year of diagnosis. Odds of MYD88 mutations were lower (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, p = .05), and median time to treatment was shorter in cases than in controls (4 vs. 32 months; p < .001). Odds of extramedullary disease were higher (OR 4.20, p = .01), while odds of neuropathy (OR 0.22, p = .25), and hyperviscosity (OR 0.26, p = .26) were lower in cases than in controls. Odds of using chemoimmunotherapy were higher (OR 2.62, p = .11) while odds of using proteasome inhibitors (OR 0.35, p = .15) and BTK inhibitors (OR 0.17, p = .21) were lower in cases than in controls. There were no differences in response and overall survival (OS) between cases and controls. Despite clinicopathological differences, response, and survival outcomes are similar between non-IgM LPL cases and WM controls.

Keywords: Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinaemia; case–control study; lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; response; survival.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, B-Cell*
  • Mutation
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia* / diagnosis
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia* / drug therapy
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia* / epidemiology