Background: In Asia, little information is available about contemporary real-world treatment patterns for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Methods and results: Consecutive patients (n=11,414) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with initial VTE and taking oral anticoagulants between May 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 were included. The temporal trends of using oral anticoagulants and pharmacomechanical therapy during the study period were evaluated. The efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin were compared. Propensity score analysis (NOACs n=3,647 vs. warfarin n=3,647) was used to balance covariates between groups, and Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment were used to estimate the risks of clinical outcomes. The use of NOACs increased from 0.3% to 60.2% for VTE treatment during the study period. Pharmacomechanical therapy was used in 9.60%, 8.22%, and 5.63% from 2014 through 2016. NOACs were associated with a 16% risk reduction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.93) in all-cause mortality and a 21% risk reduction (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96) in recurrent VTE vs. warfarin. Overall, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (aHR 0.804, 95% CI 0.648-0.998).
Conclusions: In real-world practice, NOACs have become the major anticoagulant used for Asians with VTE. Although NOACs had a lower risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding compared with warfarin in Taiwan, we still need a large-scale randomized controlled trial to confirm the findings.
Keywords: Deep vein thrombosis; Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; Pulmonary embolism; Venous thromboembolism; Warfarin.