Identifying the 'incredible'! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):798-800. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Fionn Büttner¹, Marinus Winters², Eamonn Delahunt^{3

4}, Roy Elbers⁵, Carolina B Lura², Karim M Khan⁶, Adam Weir^{7

8

9}, Clare L Ardern^{10

11

12}

¹ School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland fionn.cleirigh-buttner@ucdconnect.ie.
² Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
³ School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
⁴ Institute for Sport & Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
⁵ Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
⁶ Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
⁷ Sports Groin Pain Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
⁸ Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center for Groin Injuries, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
⁹ Sport Medicine and Exercise Clinic Haarlem (SBK), Haarlem, The Netherlands.
¹⁰ Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
¹¹ Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
¹² Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

No abstract available

Keywords: education; meta-analysis; methodological; review.

Publication types