Background: Insurance, racial, and socioeconomic health disparities continue to pose significant challenges for access to dermatologic care. Studies applying teledermatology to increase access to underinsured individuals and ethnic minorities are limited.
Objective: To determine how the implementation of a teledermatology program affects access to health care and patient outcomes.
Methods: A cross-sectional evaluation was performed of all ambulatory dermatology referrals and electronic dermatology consultations (eConsults) at Ohio State University within a 25-month period.
Results: Compared with ambulatory referrals, eConsults served more nonwhite patients (612 of 1698 [36.0%] vs 4040 of 16,073 [25.1%]; P < .001) and more Medicaid enrollees (459 of 1698 patients [27.0%] vs 3266 of 16,073 [20.3%]; P < .001). In addition, ambulatory referral patients were significantly less likely to attend their scheduled appointment compared with eConsult patients, as either "no-shows" (246 of 2526 [9.7%] vs 3 of 62 [4.8%]) or cancellations (742 of 2526 [29.4%] vs 8 of 62 [12.9%]; P = .003). There were fewer median days to extirpation for eConsult patients compared with ambulatory referral patients (interquartile range; 80.7 ± 79.8 vs 116.9 ± 86.6 days; P = .004).
Conclusion: Integrating dermatologic care through a telemedicine system can result in improved access for underserved patients through improved efficiency outcomes.
Keywords: e-Consult; electronic consultation; health disparities; socioeconomic disparities; teledermatology; telemedicine.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.