A standardized reference method is needed to accurately and precisely measure urine-formed elements (UFEs; red blood cells [RBCs], white blood cells [WBCs], and squamous epithelial cells [sECs]). We compared the results from a standard method with those from an automated analyzer. Trained technicians used standardized bright-field microscopy of fresh non-centrifuged urine samples, and disposable 1 µl chambers. Fifteen experienced technicians from 5 hospitals (3 per hospital) each performed 6 manual counts of 10 different native urine samples using a manual chamber and standard methods. The sEC counts were at least 50/µL, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 14%; the RBC and WBC counts were at least 200/µL and the CVs were less than 7%. The same samples were also analyzed 6 times using automated analyzers. The means, CVs, and biases were determined. The median CVs for the manual measurements were 6.4% (WBCs), 6.6% (RBCs), and 12.7% (sECs). The CVs of the automated analyzer were 4.7% (WBCs), 5.6% (RBCs), and 9.2% (sECs). Biases between the automated and manual methods were -2.9% to 5.0%(WBCs), -0.8% to 8.8% (RBCs) and -2.8% to 9.4% (sECs). The count mean values and expanded uncertainties of these counts were (224.5 ± 15.0) cells/µL, (234.2 ± 16.2) cells/µL, and (61.5 ± 7.9) cells/µL, respectively. The standardized manual method for measuring UFEs had high precision and accuracy, making it a suitable reference method. Use of this reference method to calibrate an automated analyzer improved the accuracy of automated analysis.
Keywords: Urine formed elements; automated microscopy analyzer; bias; coefficient of variation; reference method.