Response to "Comparison of non-absorbable silk and absorbable polyglactin sutures for external ptosis repair"
Orbit
.
2020 Jun;39(3):231.
doi: 10.1080/01676830.2019.1677728.
Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Authors
Erik R Johnson
1
,
Robi N Maamari
2
3
,
Michael G Neimkin
4
,
Zachary M Bodnar
1
5
,
John B Holds
1
2
6
Affiliations
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
2
Ophthalmic Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Inc., Des Peres, Missouri, USA.
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
4
Ophthalmic Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
5
Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford, California, USA.
6
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
PMID:
31661335
DOI:
10.1080/01676830.2019.1677728
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Blepharoplasty*
Humans
Polyglactin 910*
Silk
Sutures
Substances
Silk
Polyglactin 910