A qualitative study of oral health knowledge among African Americans

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219426. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this qualitative oral health needs assessment was to probe and better understand the oral health knowledge, beliefs, and barriers of District residents, particularly in DC wards where oral health disparities are most prevalent.

Methods: Forty-eight (n = 48) participants were recruited for four focus groups. The focus group instrument consisted of a structured interview guide addressing the following topics: oral health history, perceived barriers to oral health, knowledge and perceptions about oral systemic health, and preferred message channels for receiving information on oral/dental health. Content analysis was performed using NVivo, a computerized, qualitative informatics tool.

Results: The majority of participants in this study practiced both brushing and flossing in their daily dental routine and did not believe that tooth loss is a normal part of ageing. There was lack of knowledge on the connection between oral and systemic health, specifically impact of smoking, alcohol use, and sweets and sexual activity. Focus groups identified two main barriers to healthcare access-communication and affordability. Participants who had a dentist were satisfied and felt that their needs were met.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate a need for educational intervention and improved communication from oral health providers to increase awareness of the impact of systemic health and risky behaviors can have on oral health.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attitude to Health
  • Black or African American
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Behavior / physiology*
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Oral Health / standards*
  • Toothbrushing
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the George E Richmond Foundation. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.