Unenhanced CT for clinical triage of elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Nov;100(11):709-719. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) to those of contrast-enhanced CT for triage of patients older than 75years admitted to emergency department (ED) with acute abdominal pain (AAP).

Patients and methods: Two hundred and eight consecutive patients presenting with AAP to the ED who underwent CT with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images were retrospectively included. There were 90 men and 118 women with a mean age of 85.4±4.9 (SD) (range: 75-101.4years). Three readers reviewed unenhanced CT images first, and then unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images as a single set. Diagnostic accuracy was compared to the standard of reference defined as the final diagnosis obtained after complete clinico-biological and radiological evaluation. Correctness of the working diagnosis proposed by the ED physician was evaluated. Intra- and inter-reader agreements were calculated using the kappa test and interclass correlation. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients requiring only conservative management and for those requiring intervention.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 64% (95% CI: 62-66%) to 68% (95% CI: 66-70%) for unenhanced CT, and from 68% (95% CI: 66-70%) to 71% (95% CI: 69-73%) for both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT. Contrast-enhanced CT did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy (P=0.973-0.979). CT corrected the working diagnosis proposed by the ED physician in 59.1% (range: 58.1-60.0%) and 61.2% (range: 57.6-65.5%) of patients before and after contrast injection (P>0.05). Intra-observer agreement was moderate to substantial (k=0.513-0.711). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for unenhanced (kappa=0.745-0.789) and combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT (kappa=0.745-0.799). Results were similar in subgroup analyses.

Conclusion: Unenhanced CT alone is accurate and associated with high degrees of inter-reader agreement for clinical triage of patients older than 75years with AAP in the emergency setting.

Keywords: Acute abdominal pain; Computed tomography; Elderly; Emergency; Patient triage.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Pain / blood
  • Abdominal Pain / diagnostic imaging*
  • Abdominal Pain / etiology
  • Abdominal Pain / therapy
  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Appendicitis / diagnostic imaging
  • Cholangitis / diagnostic imaging
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Contrast Media
  • Diverticulitis / diagnostic imaging
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Obstruction / diagnostic imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography / methods*
  • Observer Variation
  • Reference Standards
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rupture, Spontaneous / diagnostic imaging
  • Stomach Ulcer / diagnostic imaging
  • Triage / methods*

Substances

  • Contrast Media