Clinical impact of a structured secondary cardiovascular prevention program following acute coronary syndromes: A prospective multicenter healthcare intervention

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211464. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Structured secondary cardiovascular prevention programs (SSCP) following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) may reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through better adherence to post-ACS recommendations.

Methods: Through a prospective multicenter cohort study, we compared the outcomes of two sequential post-ACS patient cohorts, the initial one receiving standard care (SC) followed by one receiving additional interventions (SSCP) aimed at improving patient education as well as healthcare provider and hospital systems. The primary endpoint was MACE at one year. Secondary endpoints included adherence to recommended therapies, attendance to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and successful achievement of cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) targets.

Results: In total, 2498 post-ACS patients from 4 Swiss university hospitals were included: 1210 vs 1288 in the SC and SSCP groups, respectively. The SSCP group demonstrated a significant increase in attendance to CR programs (RR 1.08, 95%CI 1.02-1.14, P = 0.006), despite not achieving the primary MACE endpoint (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.77-1.22, P = 0.79). After age-stratification, significant reductions in cardiac death, MI and stroke events (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.30-0.93, P for interaction = 0.016) were observed for SSCP patients ≤ 65 years old. The SSCP group also scored significantly better for the LDL cholesterol target (RR 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.13, P = 0.012), systolic blood pressure target (RR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01-1.13, P = 0.029) and physical activity (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, P = 0.021).

Conclusions: The implementation of an SSCP post ACS was associated with an improvement in the control of CVRF and attendance to CR programs, and was also associated with significant reductions in cardiac death, MI and stroke at one year for patients ≤65years old.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / physiopathology
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / rehabilitation
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / therapy*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Secondary Prevention / methods
  • Switzerland

Grants and funding

The work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SPUM 33CM30-124112 and SPUM 33CM30-140336, Inflammation and acute coronary syndromes (ACS)-Novel strategies for prevention and clinical management), de Reuter Foundation, Gerbex-Bourget Foundation. B.G.’s research is supported by grants from the Geneva University Hospitals, Swiss Heart Foundation, de Reuter Foundation, Gerbex-Bourget Foundation and Schmidheiny Foundation. N.R.’s research is supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF 320030-150025). R.A. and N.R.’s research on cardiovascular prevention is supported by grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation. The SPUM consortium was also supported by Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Merck Sharpe and Dome (MSD), Sanofi-Aventis and St. Jude Medical. None of the funding institutions had any role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, nor in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.