Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model

Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Feb;32(1):73-83. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001438.

Abstract

Currently, two main approaches exist to distinguish differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress and vantage sensitivity in Genotype × Environment interaction (G × E) research: regions of significance (RoS) and competitive-confirmatory approaches. Each is limited by its single-gene/single-environment foci given that most phenotypes are the product of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors. We thus addressed these two concerns in a recently developed R package (LEGIT) for constructing G × E interaction models with latent genetic and environmental scores using alternating optimization. Herein we test, by means of computer simulation, diverse G × E models in the context of both single and multiple genes and environments. Results indicate that the RoS and competitive-confirmatory approaches were highly accurate when the sample size was large, whereas the latter performed better in small samples and for small effect sizes. The competitive-confirmatory approach generally had good accuracy (a) when effect size was moderate and N ≥ 500 and (b) when effect size was large and N ≥ 250, whereas RoS performed poorly. Computational tools to determine the type of G × E of multiple genes and environments are provided as extensions in our LEGIT R package.

Keywords: diathesis-stress; differential-susceptibility; gene-by-environment interaction; regions of significance; vantage sensitivity.

MeSH terms

  • Computer Simulation
  • Disease Susceptibility*
  • Gene-Environment Interaction*
  • Genotype
  • Humans
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Phenotype