Reply to: "The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails"
Nat Commun
.
2018 Dec 17;9(1):5348.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07683-z.
Authors
Xinxin Cheng
1
2
3
,
Elvar Jónsson
4
,
Hannes Jónsson
1
4
,
Peter M Weber
5
Affiliations
1
Department of Chemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, United States.
2
The Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging (CUI), Universität Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761, Hamburg, Germany.
3
Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter (MPSD), Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761, Hamburg, Germany.
4
Faculty of Physical Sciences, VR-III, University of Iceland, 107, Reykjavík, Iceland.
5
Department of Chemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, United States. peter_weber@brown.edu.
PMID:
30559404
PMCID:
PMC6297217
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-018-07683-z
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
MeSH terms
Cations / chemistry
Density Functional Theory*
Diamines / chemistry*
Piperazines / chemistry*
Substances
Cations
Diamines
Piperazines