Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3cm renal lithiasis

Abstract

Context and objectives: The first-line treatment for >2cm lithiasis is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), leaving flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) as a second option. In the present review, the stone-free rate and the complications of both techniques were evaluated in the treatment of 2-3cm stones.

Material and methods: Systematic review of studies that compared both techniques. Studies that were not comparative, as well as those carried out in the pediatric population or with <2cm or>3cm stones, were excluded. Two researchers independently performed the investigation, obtaining 5 studies that made up a total of 815 patients: 252 belonged to the fURS group and 563 to the PNL group. Four studies were retrospective, and one was non-randomized prospective.

Results: Stone-free rate ranged between 47.0% and 95.0% for the fURS and between 87.0% and 100% for the PNL. The complication rate was 8.8-29.0% in the fURS and 11.9-27.0% in the PNL. fURS required a greater number of procedures, and had a lower decrease in haemoglobin and creatinine rise compared to PNL.

Conclusions: The stone-free rate was higher for PNL, although the fURS could reach comparable results at the expense of performing several procedures. Both techniques have a similar frequency of complications, but the PNL has more postsurgical analytical alterations.

Keywords: Flexible ureterorenoscopy; Litiasis renal 2-3cm; Nefrolitotomía percutánea; Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy; Renal lithiasis 2-3cm; Ureteroscopia flexible.