Cryopreserved Allograft in the Management of Native and Prosthetic Aortic Infections

Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr:56:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

Abstract

Background: The management of patients with aortic native and prosthetic infections is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a single-center experience with the use of cryopreserved allografts for the treatment of aortic infections, and compare outcomes with rifampin-soaked grafts and extra-anatomic bypass.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an operative intervention for aortic infection at our tertiary care center from August 2007 to August 2017. Demographic data, preoperative work-up, procedural details, and outcomes were collected for each treatment modality.

Results: Thirty-two patients had aortic revascularization for aortic infection. Seventeen patients had cryopreserved allografts, 10 had rifampin-soaked grafts, and 5 had extra-anatomic bypass. Sixteen patients (50%) had native aortic infection and 16 patients (50%) had prosthetic aortic infection. Eighteen had involvement of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 12 of the paravisceral aorta, and 2 of the descending thoracic aorta. Early mortality was 5.9% (1/17) for the cryopreserved group, 10% (1/10) for the rifampin-soaked group, and 40% (2/5) for the extra-anatomic bypass group. Early graft-related complications occurred in 1 patient (cryopreserved group). Mean follow-up was 34.8 months. Late death occurred in 4 patients with cryopreserved allografts, 2 with rifampin-soaked grafts and none with extra-anatomic bypass. Late graft-related complications occurred in 4 patients (cryopreserved group). Only 1 patient had recurrence of aortic infection (cryopreserved group) and 2 patients had limb loss (1 from the cryopreserved group and 1 from the rifampin-soaked group). At 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, estimated survival for patients with cryopreserved allografts was 94%, 82%, 75%, and 64%, respectively.

Conclusions: The management of aortic infections is challenging. In patients who do not need immediate intervention, in situ aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts is a viable treatment modality with relatively low morbidity and mortality.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Allografts
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Aorta, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging
  • Aorta, Abdominal / microbiology
  • Aorta, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Aorta, Thoracic / diagnostic imaging
  • Aorta, Thoracic / microbiology
  • Aorta, Thoracic / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis* / adverse effects
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Cryopreservation*
  • Device Removal
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnostic imaging
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / microbiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / mortality
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rifampin / administration & dosage
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Rifampin