Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients With Turbulent Aortic Flow

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):317-322. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000819.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess variability in measurements and accurately quantify aortic regurgitation in patients with coexisting turbulent aortic flow using phase-contrast magnetic resonance.

Methods: All patients (n = 21) underwent phase-contrast magnetic resonance at 2 or more sites: ascending aorta, sinuses of Valsalva, and left ventricular outflow tract. The net flow/minute (NF), forward flow/minute (FF), regurgitant flow/minute (RF), and regurgitant fraction (RF%) were compared with the sum of superior vena cava and descending aortic flow/minute, left ventricular cardiac output, difference between the 2, and percentage difference, respectively.

Results: The NF, FF, and RF were significantly different between each site. The combination of FF in the left ventricular outflow tract and NF from the superior vena cava + descending aorta provided the best reliability of RF and regurgitant fraction (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.881 [95% confidence interval, 0.882-0.878] and 0.838 [95% confidence interval, 0.837-0.838]).

Conclusion: Combining flow measurements from more than 1 site provides the most accurate quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients with turbulent aortic flow.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aortic Valve / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Valve / physiopathology
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency / physiopathology*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Young Adult