Parental And Clinician Views Of Consent In Neonatal Research

Ir Med J. 2018 Mar 14;111(3):706.

Abstract

Aim: To determine parental and clinician views of the informed consent process in neonatal research.

Methods: A questionnaire-based study on the informed consent process. Two questionnaires were developed and distributed to parents and clinicians over a four-month period.

Results: Thirty-four parents (79%) surveyed had consented their baby to a research study. The majority of clinicians (72%) had a preference for antenatal provision of information. A desire to help future babies (97%, n=32) and a belief that their baby's healthcare would directly benefit (72%, n=28) were primary reasons for consenting. The majority (76% n=28) of parents were not in favour of a waiver of consent. However twenty clinicians (56%) agreed that a waiver of consent may be appropriate in neonatal research. Thirty-one (86%) clinicians rated GCP training as important.

Discussion: Parents are generally supportive of neonatal research. Good clinical practice training is essential for clinicians involved in neonatal research.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Education, Medical
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Informed Consent / psychology*
  • Neonatology*
  • Parents / psychology*
  • Perception*
  • Physicians / psychology*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / psychology
  • Research*
  • Social Support
  • Surveys and Questionnaires