Fluorescent in situ hybridization can be used as a complementary assay for the diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infection

Infection. 2019 Apr;47(2):317-321. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1243-0. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

Abstract

Background: Immunohistochemistry and Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining have been routinely used for the diagnosis of Whipple's disease (WD). However, these methods present limitations. As a result, the last years, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been increasingly used as a complementary tool for the diagnosis of WD from various tissue samples.

Case report: In this study, we visualized, by FISH, Tropheryma whipplei within macrophages of a lymph node from a patient with WD. Moreover, we report in this study a patient with a pulmonary biopsy compatible with WD by PAS, immunostaining and FISH, although the specific molecular assays for T. whipplei were negative. Sequencing analysis of the 16S rDNA revealed a T. whipplei-related species with unknown classification.

Conclusion: FISH can be a valuable method for the detection of Tropheryma species in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. FISH cannot replace the other already approved diagnostic techniques for WD, it can be used as a complementary tool and can provide supplementary information in a relatively short time.

Keywords: Fluorescent in situ hybridization; Lymphadenopathy; Respiratory infection; Tropheryma whipplei; Whipple’s disease.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Belgium
  • Biopsy
  • Female
  • France
  • Humans
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence / methods*
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology
  • Macrophages / pathology
  • Tropheryma / classification
  • Tropheryma / isolation & purification*
  • Whipple Disease / diagnosis*
  • Whipple Disease / microbiology