Describing the Reportable Range Is Important for Reliable Treatment Decisions: A Multiple Laboratory Study for Molecular Tumor Profiling Using Next-Generation Sequencing

J Mol Diagn. 2018 Nov;20(6):743-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Abstract

Because interpretation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data remains challenging, optimization of the NGS process is needed to obtain correct sequencing results. Therefore, extensive validation and continuous monitoring of the quality is essential. NGS performance was compared with traditional detection methods and technical quality of nine NGS technologies was assessed. First, nine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded patient samples were analyzed by 114 laboratories by using different detection methods. No significant differences in performance were observed between analyses with NGS and traditional techniques. Second, two DNA control samples were analyzed for a selected number of variants by 26 participants with the use of nine different NGS technologies. Quality control metrics were analyzed from raw data files and a survey about routine procedures. Results showed large differences in coverages, but observed variant allele frequencies in raw data files were in line with predefined variant allele frequencies. Many false negative results were found because of low-quality regions, which were not reported as such. It is recommended to disclose the reportable range, the fraction of targeted genomic regions for which calls of acceptable quality can be generated, to avoid any errors in therapy decisions. NGS can be a reliable technique, only if essential quality control during analysis is applied and reported.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods*
  • Gene Expression Profiling*
  • Gene Frequency / genetics
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods*
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results