[Do we need syncope units? : Experience from Bolzano, South Tyrol (Italy)]

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2018 Jun;29(2):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s00399-018-0561-3. Epub 2018 May 14.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Syncope is a common cause for presentation to the emergency department. Because of the numerous differential diagnoses which can be life-threatening, it can be a challenging work-up for the physician. This often results in admission rates that are too high and hospital stays that are too long with consequent high costs. Several studies have shown the inferiority of best-clinical practice to an evidence-based approach in syncope work-up, which results in underdiagnosis and often incorrect diagnosis of syncope. The consequences are undirected therapies and subsequently high recurrence rates of syncope, which lead to limited quality of life and readmissions. For this reason, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope recommend the organization of Syncope Units. Through a standardized and evidence-based approach, the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up can be done in a safe and effective manner, allowing an organized follow-up and further management of patients with syncope. This article summarizes the reasons for the need of syncope units and explains the practical implementation of the guidelines using the example of the Syncope Unit in Bolzano, South Tyrol (Italy).

Keywords: Fainting; Fast-track; Guidelines; Neurocardiogenic syncope; Transient loss of consciousness.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Length of Stay
  • Quality of Life*
  • Syncope*