Approaches to Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Device Design, Performance, and Limitations

Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):106-113. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-106.

Abstract

Up to 6.1 million people in the United States have atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulants are the mainstay of stroke prevention in AF. For decades, warfarin was the only available drug, fraught with compliance limitations, a narrow therapeutic window, and a high risk of hemorrhage. Pharmacologic developments have produced new anticoagulants that have improved the rates of stroke related to AF; however, they still confer a high risk of bleeding, making them unsuitable for some patients. Studies have shown that roughly 90% of strokes in patients with AF occur in the left atrial appendage (LAA). This understanding has prompted the development and testing of novel percutaneous strategies for LAA closure as an alternative to anticoagulation therapy. The following review examines the relative merits and shortcomings of these strategies and explores future prospects in the prevention of AF-related stroke.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardioembolic stroke; left atrial appendage; percutaneous LAA closure; stroke; thromboembolism.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Atrial Appendage* / diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Appendage* / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Cardiac Catheterization / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization / instrumentation*
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke / etiology
  • Stroke / prevention & control*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticoagulants