Comparison of Glycated Hemoglobin Results Based on At-Home and In-Lab Dried Blood Spot Sampling to Routine Venous Blood Sampling In-Lab in Adult Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Objectives: Regular measurement of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is logistically demanding. Home blotter-paper collection offers an alternative. This study tested the viability of at-home blotter-paper A1C measurement.

Methods: Objective: compare accuracy of A1C levels collected on blotter paper at home (home-blotter) and blotter-paper collection in laboratory (lab-blotter) with venous A1C (routine measurement). Agreement was assessed by Pearson correlation, Lin concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs) and Bland-Altman plots and associated statistics.

Results: Home-blotter, lab-blotter and venous A1C correlated strongly (0.93, 0.93). Home- and lab-blotter results were upwardly biased (0.387%, 0.1%). Bias increased with time. Bias correction provided agreement for both blotters (CCC >0.9); blotters correctly identifying levels above 7% (53 mmol/mol) were 100% for corrected home-blotters and 87% (95% confidence interval) for corrected lab-blotters. NPVs (% blotters correctly identifying levels of 7% or lower [53 mmol/mol]) were 100% for corrected home-blotters and 83% for corrected lab-blotters. After correction, >92% of corrected blotters had errors of 8% or less. Of our subjects, 88.5% found home sampling preferable to routine laboratory sampling.

Conclusions: Home-blotter collection is an alternative to routine collection.

Keywords: A1C accuracy; A1C measurement; blotter paper; dried blood spot sampling; exactitude de l'A1c; glucose monitoring; glycated hemoglobin (A1C); hémoglobine glyquée (A1c); mesure de l'A1c; papier buvard; surveillance de la glycémie; échantillonnage de gouttes de sang séché.