Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?

J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):787-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) requires practice and training to perform well. We developed a simple, low-cost, inanimate model to teach surgical residents inguinal anatomy and the technique of mesh insertion for a safe, endoscopic TEP-IHR. The objective of this study was to compare our model vs cadaveric dissection for teaching anatomy and mesh insertion.

Methods: A total of 14 general surgery residents participated in an institutional review board approved, prospective, and randomized study. Participants received a timed, web-based, interactive pretest assessing relevant anatomy and operative-based techniques. They then performed endoscopic TEP-IHRs on either a cadaver or our low-cost model. Participants then received a timed, web-based interactive posttest consisting of the same questions. Participants were surveyed anonymously regarding the degree to which either the model or the cadaver was educationally effective.

Results: Both groups of trainees (cadaver = 7, low-cost model = 7) scored higher on the posttest (p<0.05) with similar improvement (cadaver group: pretest = 78% correct, posttest = 87%; low-cost model group: 77% vs 86%). Survey results revealed the trainees preferred for both initial learning and understanding of mesh placement using low-cost models (5 out of 5, 4.8/5, respectively) over cadavers (4.0/5, 3.8/5, respectively; p<0.05). Trainees preferred the cadaver (4.7) over the low-cost model (3.9, p<0.05) in overall experience. No differences were found in the trainees' preference between the cadaver (4.5) and low-cost model (4.7) in the overall educational value.

Conclusion: While the overall educational experience of 14 learners favored a cadaver experience to learn TEP-IHR, initial anatomical learning and placing the mesh was better with an inanimate model. Given the educational value of the 2 methods was equivalent, the $1500 cost for cadavers make the inexpensive and repeatable inanimate model an attractive early resource for learning TEP-IHR.

Keywords: Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; Systems-Based Practice; general surgery; homemade model; simulation; totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Cadaver
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Dissection / methods
  • Education, Medical, Graduate / methods*
  • Endoscopy / education*
  • Female
  • General Surgery / education
  • Hernia, Inguinal / surgery*
  • Herniorrhaphy / education*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Minnesota
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Prospective Studies