An assessment of equity in the distribution of non-financial health care inputs across public primary health care facilities in Tanzania

Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 11;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0620-0.

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on how health care inputs are distributed from the sub-national level down to health facilities and their potential influence on promoting health equity. To address this gap, this paper assesses equity in the distribution of health care inputs across public primary health facilities at the district level in Tanzania.

Methods: This is a quantitative assessment of equity in the distribution of health care inputs (staff, drugs, medical supplies and equipment) from district to facility level. The study was carried out in three districts (Kinondoni, Singida Rural and Manyoni district) in Tanzania. These districts were selected because they were implementing primary care reforms. We administered 729 exit surveys with patients seeking out-patient care; and health facility surveys at 69 facilities in early 2014. A total of seventeen indices of input availability were constructed with the collected data. The distribution of inputs was considered in relation to (i) the wealth of patients accessing the facilities, which was taken as a proxy for the wealth of the population in the catchment area; and (ii) facility distance from the district headquarters. We assessed equity in the distribution of inputs through the use of equity ratios, concentration indices and curves.

Results: We found a significant pro-rich distribution of clinical staff and nurses per 1000 population. Facilities with the poorest patients (most remote facilities) have fewer staff per 1000 population than those with the least poor patients (least remote facilities): 0.6 staff per 1000 among the poorest, compared to 0.9 among the least poor; 0.7 staff per 1000 among the most remote facilities compared to 0.9 among the least remote. The negative concentration index for support staff suggests a pro-poor distribution of this cadre but the 45 degree dominated the concentration curve. The distribution of vaccines, antibiotics, anti-diarrhoeal, anti-malarials and medical supplies was approximately proportional (non dominance), whereas the distribution of oxytocics, anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and anti-hypertensive drugs was pro-rich, with the 45 degree line dominating the concentration curve for ART.

Conclusion: This study has shown there are inequities in the distribution of health care inputs across public primary care facilities. This highlights the need to ensure a better coordinated and equitable distribution of inputs through regular monitoring of the availability of health care inputs and strengthening of reporting systems.

Keywords: Distribution; Equity; Health care inputs; Tanzania.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities
  • Child, Preschool
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Equipment and Supplies
  • Female
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Health Facilities*
  • Health Personnel
  • Health Resources*
  • Healthcare Disparities*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations
  • Poverty*
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Public Sector
  • Resource Allocation*
  • Rural Health Services
  • Rural Population*
  • Social Class
  • Tanzania

Substances

  • Pharmaceutical Preparations