Optimizing Mechanical Alignment With Modular Stems in Revision TKA

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S209-S213. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.039. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

Background: Although mechanical alignment is critical for optimal function and long-term implant durability, the role of modular stems in achieving ideal alignment is unclear.

Methods: We identified 319 revision total knee arthroplasty from 2003-2013, for which stem length, stem diameter, and stem fixation method were recorded prospectively. Three-dimensional canal-filling ratio, the product of canal-filling ratio at the stem tip in both the anteroposterior and lateral planes, and alignment were measured radiographically.

Results: Ideal alignment of the femur was considered to be 95° in the anteroposterior (AP) plane and from 1° of extension to 4° of flexion in the lateral plane, and ideal tibial alignment was considered to be 90° in the AP plane. Even after accounting for difference in stem size and canal-fill, ideal AP alignment was more reliably achieved with press-fit stems.

Conclusion: Furthermore, increased engagement of the diaphysis and its anatomical axis with canal-filling stems facilitates accurate alignment.

Keywords: mechanical alignment; modular stems; radiographs; revision total knee arthroplasty; stem fixation.

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / instrumentation*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods*
  • Diaphyses
  • Femur / surgery
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Reoperation
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Tibia / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome