Implementation science: Relevance in the real world without sacrificing rigor

Elvin H Geng; David Peiris; Margaret E Kruk

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002288

Implementation science: Relevance in the real world without sacrificing rigor

PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 25;14(4):e1002288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002288. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Authors

Elvin H Geng¹, David Peiris², Margaret E Kruk³

Affiliations

¹ Division of HIV/AIDS, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
² The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
³ Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

Three members of PLOS Medicine's editorial board who are leading researchers in implementation science define the characteristics of high-quality studies and invite their submission to the journal.

Publication types

Editorial

MeSH terms

Editorial Policies*
Humans
Publishing*
Research Personnel
Science / standards*
Translational Research, Biomedical / standards*

Grants and funding

P30 MH062246/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States