Comparison of five assays for antibody to varicella-zoster virus and the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Nov;25(11):2059-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2059-2062.1987.

Abstract

Three commercially available assays (the Varicelisa Test Kit [Whittaker M.A. Bioproducts, Walkersville, Md.], the VZV Indirect Fluorescent-Antibody Test [Electro-Nucleonics, Inc., Columbia, Md.], and the Litton VZV Bio-EnzaBead Screen Kit [Litton Bionetics, Inc., Charleston, S.C.]) and two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays used in our laboratory, one using a membrane-associated antigen and the other using a soluble antigen dotted on nitrocellulose paper, were compared with a varicella-zoster virus antibody reference assay, the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test. All of the assays compared favorably to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test when evaluated for sensitivity (0.95), specificity (0.84), and test-retest reliability (79 to 96%), except for the Litton assay, which demonstrated significantly different results for all of the parameters tested (0.55, 1.0, and 69%, respectively).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antibodies, Viral / analysis*
  • Antigens, Surface / immunology
  • Antigens, Viral / immunology*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Herpesvirus 3, Human / immunology*
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin A / analysis
  • Immunoglobulin G / analysis
  • Immunoglobulin M / analysis
  • Immunoglobulins / analysis*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Antigens, Surface
  • Antigens, Viral
  • Immunoglobulin A
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Immunoglobulin M
  • Immunoglobulins
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic