Spatial heterogeneity of physicochemical properties explains differences in microbial composition in arid soils from Cuatro Cienegas, Mexico

PeerJ. 2016 Sep 8:4:e2459. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2459. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Arid ecosystems are characterized by high spatial heterogeneity, and the variation among vegetation patches is a clear example. Soil biotic and abiotic factors associated with these patches have also been well documented as highly heterogeneous in space. Given the low vegetation cover and little precipitation in arid ecosystems, soil microorganisms are the main drivers of nutrient cycling. Nonetheless, little is known about the spatial distribution of microorganisms and the relationship that their diversity holds with nutrients and other physicochemical gradients in arid soils. In this study, we evaluated the spatial variability of soil microbial diversity and chemical parameters (nutrients and ion content) at local scale (meters) occurring in a gypsum-based desert soil, to gain knowledge on what soil abiotic factors control the distribution of microbes in arid ecosystems. We analyzed 32 soil samples within a 64 m(2) plot and: (a) characterized microbial diversity using T-RFLPs of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, (b) determined soil chemical parameters, and (c) identified relationships between microbial diversity and chemical properties. Overall, we found a strong correlation between microbial composition heterogeneity and spatial variation of cations (Ca(2), K(+)) and anions (HCO[Formula: see text], Cl(-), SO[Formula: see text]) content in this small plot. Our results could be attributable to spatial differences of soil saline content, favoring the patchy emergence of salt and soil microbial communities.

Keywords: Arid soils; Biological soil crusts; Cuatro Cienegas Basin; Physicochemical properties; Spatial heterogeneity; T-RFLPs.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM-PAPIIT grant IA200814 to AEE) and SEMARNAT-CONACyT (grant 23459 to VS). SP received financial support from a CONACyT research visiting fellowship (186372). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.