Comparison of Ventilation With One-Handed Mask Seal With an Intraoral Mask Versus Conventional Cuffed Face Mask in a Cadaver Model: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;69(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 27.

Abstract

Study objective: We compare received minute volume with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed face mask among medics obtaining a 1-handed mask seal on a cadaver model.

Methods: This study comprised a randomized crossover trial of adult US Army combat medic volunteers participating in a cadaver laboratory as part of their training. We randomized participants to obtain a 1-handed mask seal during ventilation of a fresh unembalmed cadaver, first using either an intraoral airway device or conventional cuffed face mask. Participants obtained a 1-handed mask seal while a ventilator delivered 10 standardized 750-mL breaths during 1 minute. After a 5-minute rest period, they repeated the study with the alternative mask. The primary outcome measure was received minute volume as measured by a respirometer.

Results: Of 27 recruited participants, all completed the study. Median received minute volume was higher with the intraoral mask compared with conventional cuffed mask by 1.7 L (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.9 L; P<.001).

Conclusion: The intraoral mask resulted in greater received minute volume received compared with conventional cuffed face mask during ventilation with a 1-handed mask seal in a cadaver model. The intraoral mask may prove a useful airway adjunct for ventilation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT12345678.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cadaver
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Humans
  • Laryngeal Masks*
  • Male
  • Respiration, Artificial / instrumentation
  • Respiration, Artificial / methods*

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT12345678