Abstract
Background:
Concern for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may result in administration of more costly agents. We prospectively compared outpatient CIN incidence of iodixanol to iohexol.
Methods:
Patients were randomized to receive 100ml of iohexol (n=47) or iodixanol (n=55). We compared patients who developed CIN using the Wilson score interval and also calculated an odds ratio for the development of CIN.
Results:
CIN rate for iohexol was 2% compared to 9% for iodixanol. Those receiving iodixanol were almost 5 times more likely to experience CIN.
Conclusion:
These results do not suggest a benefit of iodixanol over iohexol in the study population.
Keywords:
Contrast nephropathy (CIN); Iodixanol; Iohexol; Outpatient.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication types
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
MeSH terms
-
Acute Kidney Injury / chemically induced*
-
Acute Kidney Injury / diagnosis
-
Acute Kidney Injury / epidemiology
-
Adult
-
Aged
-
Aged, 80 and over
-
Contrast Media / administration & dosage
-
Contrast Media / adverse effects
-
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
-
Female
-
Florida / epidemiology
-
Humans
-
Incidence
-
Injections, Intravenous
-
Iohexol / administration & dosage
-
Iohexol / adverse effects*
-
Male
-
Middle Aged
-
Outpatients*
-
Prognosis
-
Renal Insufficiency / complications
-
Renal Insufficiency / diagnosis*
-
Renal Insufficiency / epidemiology
-
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / adverse effects*
-
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods
-
Triiodobenzoic Acids / administration & dosage
-
Triiodobenzoic Acids / adverse effects*
Substances
-
Contrast Media
-
Triiodobenzoic Acids
-
Iohexol
-
iodixanol