Neurocognitive clinical outcome assessments for inborn errors of metabolism and other rare conditions

Mol Genet Metab. 2016 Jun;118(2):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

Abstract

Well-defined and reliable clinical outcome assessments are essential for determining whether a drug provides clinically meaningful treatment benefit for patients. In 2015, FDA convened a workshop, "Assessing Neurocognitive Outcomes in Inborn Errors of Metabolism." Topics covered included special challenges of clinical studies of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) and other rare diseases; complexities of identifying treatment effects in the context of the dynamic processes of child development and disease progression; and the importance of natural history studies. Clinicians, parents/caregivers, and participants from industry, academia, and government discussed factors to consider when developing measures to assess treatment outcomes, as well as tools and methods that may contribute to standardizing measures. Many issues examined are relevant to the broader field of rare diseases in addition to specifics of IEMs.

Keywords: Clinical outcome assessment; Drug development; Inborn errors; Natural history studies; Neurocognitive; Rare diseases.

MeSH terms

  • Caregivers
  • Child
  • Child Development
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Mental Status and Dementia Tests / standards*
  • Metabolism, Inborn Errors / drug therapy*
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Parents
  • Rare Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Remote Sensing Technology
  • United States
  • United States Food and Drug Administration