Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and System Review

Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.055. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the preferred surgical procedure, causing fewer injuries compared with thoracotomy, but whether VATS can achieve the same lymph node (LN) dissection efficacy is controversial. A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing VATS and thoracotomy in LN dissection for clinical stage I lung cancer. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria and involved 2,190 patients in the VATS group and 3,000 patients in the open group. Meta-analysis showed that fewer total LNs were dissected in the VATS group, although VATS harvested more left-side LNs. The same number of total LN stations, N2 LNs, N2 LN stations, N1 LNs, and right-side LNs was harvested in both groups. Our findings require further validation in more high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Data Accuracy
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Lymph Node Excision / methods*
  • Lymphatic Metastasis*
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted*
  • Thoracoscopy*
  • Treatment Outcome